The purpose of this blog is to educate entertainingly, entertain purposefully, and to evangelise for the Lord.
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Monday, June 22, 2015
Top 5 Most Expensive Fish in Malaysia
Top
5 Most Expensive Fish in Malaysia
·Share This Article :
212
3
1
·Discuss This Article :
3
Malaysia - a country that is synonymous with an amazing variety of
distinctively delicious food, thanks to the melting pot of cultures that exist
in harmony here. If someone were to try and do a write-up of the types of food
that can be found in abundance in this country, it would be never-ending. So we
decided that we'd write about a creature that can be found in at least one of
the dishes from all of the cultures: the fish. Fish first appeared in existence
around 530 million years ago and the evolution of this creature led to what is
now a highly versatile source of meat. Do read on for the top 5 most expensive
fish to be found in Malaysia:
Ikan Empurau
1) Can you imagine anyone doling out about RM550 for a kilogram of
fish (and that is just the cheapest price you can get)? Neither can I. But that
is exactly what many food connoisseurs are doing for a type of freshwater fish
called the "Empurau" from the Tor tambroides species, or
also known as "忘不了 (unforgettable) in Chinese. This fish can only be found in
Sarawak, and is prized for its sweet, tender flesh and smooth texture. What
makes its flesh that way and commanding hefty price tags that can reach up to
RM2,000, is their diet of "Engkabang" fruits and flowers.
Ikan Jelawat
2) A type of fish that has flesh which is similarly sweet and fine
like the Empurau's but with a price tag that isn't as hefty is the Sultan Fish,
or also known as Ikan Jelawat. This fish is from the Leptobarbus
hoevenii species and belong to the Barb family. The flesh of this
omnivore fish is soft with a subtly sweet flavour accompnaied by a nice layer
of fat under the skin, probably due to the fact that this fish eats the fruit
that fall near the riverbanks. It would set you back about RM320 for a kilogram
of this tasty fish, quite a dent in the pocket as well.
Ikan Semah
3) Ikan Semah, from the Tor Labeobarbus species, is indigenous to Borneo's higher
reaches of freshwater rivers as it cannot be found anywhere outside this range.
They are omnivores but usually prefer a diet of localized plant materials. Much
of its natural habitat is affected by pollution and and their population in the
wild is quickly dwindling, brought on by agriculture, logging and overfishing.
Due to its exclusivity and different textures between the wild Ikan Semah to
the cultured ones, the price per kilogram for this breed of fish can reach
RM300, a pretty penny indeed.
Ikan Tengadak
4) For those looking for something that is still tasty would
probably want to check out the "Ikan Tengadak" which is native to the
waters of Borneo. It has a price tag of about RM250 per kilogram and it is a rather
bony fish with tiny "Y-shaped" fish bones. That aside, this breed has
similarly very sweet and flaky flesh and is good in taste, making it a popular
choice for people who are looking for a delicate freshness and good quality
fish at a more affordable price.
Ikan Ketutu
5) Finally, we have the Marble Goby fish, or "Soon Hock"
fish as it is more popularly known in Malaysia ("Ikan Ketutu" in
Malay). This fish is one of the biggest of gobies and comes from the Oxyeleotris
Marmoratus species and its
natural habitat is the brackish waters of streams, canals and lakes. As always,
expensive fishes will have the trademark smooth, sweet, flaky and finely
textured flesh. Coming in at RM100 per kilogram, this fish rounds up our list
of Malaysia's Top 5 Most Expensive Fishes!
|
Type of Fish
|
RM per KG
|
|
Ikan Empurau
|
RM550
|
|
Ikan Jelawat
|
RM320
|
|
Ikan Semah
|
RM300
|
|
Ikan Tengadak
|
RM250
|
|
Ikan Ketutu
|
RM100
|
Saturday, June 20, 2015
Thursday, June 18, 2015
DNA Scientist Francis Collins believes in Jesus
By Dr. Francis Collins
Special to CNN
Special to CNN
Editor's note: Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., is the director
of the Human Genome Project. His most recent book is "The Language of God:
A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief."
ROCKVILLE, Maryland (CNN) -- I am a scientist and a believer, and I find no conflict
between those world views.
As
the director of the Human Genome Project, I have led a consortium of scientists
to read out the 3.1 billion letters of the human genome, our own DNA
instruction book. As a believer, I see DNA, the information molecule of all
living things, as God's language, and the elegance and complexity of our own
bodies and the rest of nature as a reflection of God's plan.
I
did not always embrace these perspectives. As a graduate student in physical
chemistry in the 1970s, I was an atheist, finding no reason to postulate the
existence of any truths outside of mathematics, physics and chemistry. But then
I went to medical school, and encountered life and death issues at the bedsides
of my patients. Challenged by one of those patients, who asked "What do
you believe, doctor?", I began searching for answers.
I
had to admit that the science I loved so much was powerless to answer questions
such as "What is the meaning of life?" "Why am I here?"
"Why does mathematics work, anyway?" "If the universe had a
beginning, who created it?" "Why are the physical constants in the
universe so finely tuned to allow the possibility of complex life forms?"
"Why do humans have a moral sense?" "What happens after we
die?"
I
had always assumed that faith was based on purely emotional and irrational
arguments, and was astounded to discover, initially in the writings of the
Oxford scholar C.S. Lewis and subsequently from many other sources, that one
could build a very strong case for the plausibility of the existence of God on
purely rational grounds. My earlier atheist's assertion that "I know there
is no God" emerged as the least defensible. As the British writer G.K.
Chesterton famously remarked, "Atheism is the most daring of all dogmas,
for it is the assertion of a universal negative."
But
reason alone cannot prove the existence of God. Faith is reason plus
revelation, and the revelation part requires one to think with the spirit as
well as with the mind. You have to hear the music, not just read the notes on
the page. Ultimately, a leap of faith is required.
For
me, that leap came in my 27th year, after a search to learn more about God's
character led me to the person of Jesus Christ. Here was a person with remarkably
strong historical evidence of his life, who made astounding statements about
loving your neighbor, and whose claims about being God's son seemed to demand a
decision about whether he was deluded or the real thing. After resisting for
nearly two years, I found it impossible to go on living in such a state of
uncertainty, and I became a follower of Jesus.
So,
some have asked, doesn't your brain explode? Can you both pursue an
understanding of how life works using the tools of genetics and molecular biology,
and worship a creator God? Aren't evolution and faith in God incompatible? Can
a scientist believe in miracles like the resurrection?
Actually,
I find no conflict here, and neither apparently do the 40 percent of working
scientists who claim to be believers. Yes, evolution by descent from a common
ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence
from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof
of our relatedness to all other living things.
But
why couldn't this be God's plan for creation? True, this is incompatible with
an ultra-literal interpretation of Genesis, but long before Darwin, there were
many thoughtful interpreters like St. Augustine, who found it impossible to be
exactly sure what the meaning of that amazing creation story was supposed to
be. So attaching oneself to such literal interpretations in the face of
compelling scientific evidence pointing to the ancient age of Earth and the
relatedness of living things by evolution seems neither wise nor necessary for
the believer.
I
have found there is a wonderful harmony in the complementary truths of science
and faith. The God of the Bible is also the God of the genome. God can be found
in the cathedral or in the laboratory. By investigating God's majestic and
awesome creation, science can actually be a means of worship.
Wednesday, June 17, 2015
Friday, June 12, 2015
List of Sevens in book Revelation
|
Symbol
|
Reference
|
|
Churches
|
1:4; 2:1-3:22
|
|
Letters
|
2:1- 3:22
|
|
Spirits
|
1:4; 3:1; 4:5; 5:6
|
|
Golden lampstands
|
1:12, 20; 2:1; 4:5
|
|
Stars
|
1:16, 20; 2:1; 3:1
|
|
Seals
|
5:1; 5:5; 6:1
|
|
Horns
|
5:6
|
|
Eyes
|
5:6
|
|
Angels
|
8:2, 6; 15:1, 6, 7;
15:8; 16:1; 17:1; 21:9
|
|
Trumpets
|
8:2, 6
|
|
Thunders
|
10:3, 4
|
|
Thousand people
|
11:13
|
|
Heads
|
12:3; 13:1; 17:3, 7, 9
|
|
Crowns
|
12:3
|
|
Plagues
|
15:1, 6, 8; 21:9
|
|
Golden bowls
|
15:7; 16:1; 17:1; 21:9
|
|
Hills
|
17:9
|
|
Kings
|
17:10, 11
|
|
Last 7 visions
|
Chapters 20-21
|
Wednesday, June 10, 2015
Creator makes Jupiter protect Earth from comets
Creator has positioned
Jupiter to protect Earth
We live in a cosmic
shooting gallery. In Phil Plait’s Death from the Skies, he lays out
the dangers of a massive impact: destructive shockwaves, tsunamis, flash fires,
atmospheric darkening…. The scenario isn’t pretty should a big one come our
way. Fortunately, we may have a silent guardian: Jupiter.
Is it true that Jupiter could be considered
our friendliest planet because – without Jupiter – comets would be more likely
to hit us?
The answer is yes … Some astronomers
believe that one reason Earth is habitable is that the gravity of Jupiter does
help protect us from some comets. Long-period comets, in particular, enter the
solar system from its outer reaches. Jupiter’s gravity is thought to sling most
of these fast-moving ice balls out of the solar system before they can get
close to Earth. So long-period comets are thought to strike Earth only on very
long timescales of millions or tens of millions of years. Without Jupiter nearby,
long-period comets would collide with our planet much more frequently.
In addition, in recent decades, astronomers
have been able to see signs of comets that have crashed into Jupiter. There was
Comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 in 1994. And, in 2009, astronomers observed a dark gash
in one side of the giant planet, likely caused by a comet.
Monday, June 8, 2015
Sunday, June 7, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









